Day After M1: A Look at the Papers

Well the big day has come and gone.  Massive protests in LA, Chicago, New York.  A veritable general strike.  How’s the media doing with it?  Not so well.

Maybe it’s just naive to think that something as big as these protests will be the number one headline on NPR the next day.  After all, yesterday’s noon NPR report was from Phoenix–reporting that the human chain demonstration there had been cancelled for “safety reasons.”  That was it–nothing about the hundreds of thousands of people marching at that very moment in Chicago.

But still, I was a little shocked with this morning’s 8 AM headlines on Morning Edition started with … the resignation of Italy’s Prime Minister!  Okay, sure, that’s an important story, and it’s good for American media to highlight international news.  But come on!  Perhaps a million people on the streets in one day?  Sorry, doesn’t make the lead story.  Somebody at NPR is chicken.

So how are the online newspapers doing?  New York Times:  Berlusconi leads, immigrant protests below the “fold.”  Washington Post:  Bird Flu is #1 story, immigrants #2 (“Although the protests caught the nation’s attention, the economic impact was mixed, as many immigrants heeded the call of some leaders
not to jeopardize their jobs, and businesses adopted strategies to cope
with absent employees.”).  Alternatively, Slate has a piece by historian Nelson Lichtenstein on the significance of May Day. 

The Chicago Tribune’s front page downplays the march, but there is some content.  Eric Zorn’s blog is a bit goofy.  He can’t figure out what the immigrants want until he sees a 13 year old girl with a t-shirt that says “Don’t Take Away My Dream.”  He concludes, America is “a nation of laws, it’s true, but we’re also a nation of
dreams–the greatest such nation ever. And our laws should reflect that.”  True enough.  The Trib’s editorial is similarly middle of the road, calling on the Senate to act on “
the emerging American consensus on immigration reform”–i.e., some mix of crackdown, amnesty, and guest worker program.

Not surprisingly, the LA Times has the best coverage on the issue.  They lead with “Next Challenge:  Converting Protests to Political Clout.”  And they have a series of photo galleries, and a series of related articles.

As usual, the best stories on on Indymedia sites.  LA Indymedia has great photographs, and an interview with the leader of the port truck drivers who claim to have organized a 90% effective strike.

The most bizarre thing I heard last night–did I hear this right?–Bush commented on the boycott saying something like “we don’t want to lose our soul.”  How’s
that for antiworker opinion.  Go on strike, lose your soul.  Did anyone else hear that?

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Day After M1: A Look at the Papers

  1. E. says:

    I didn’t hear the Bush comment, but nothing he says surprises me anymore.

    Nightline devoted most of last night’s show to the May Day demonstrations in various parts of the country. The script was tepid and at times incoherent (e.g. noting the wide disparity of political opinions based on the fact that some signs indicated support for labor, some quoted the Declaration of Independence, and some sported the American flag. Since when is labor inconsistent with the American flag or the Declaration of Independence?) but there seemed to be a recognition of the significance of the day’s labor/immigration rallies.

  2. Toby Higbie says:

    “The script was tepid and at times incoherent”: a good summary of the Democratic party’s position as well.

    Good to hear from ya E!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s